Maidul Hasan’s Article 71


The document discusses the historical context surrounding the Bangladesh Liberation War and the subsequent political developments in the newly independent Bangladesh. Here’s a more detailed description of the events with greater context:

  1. Background of the Liberation War:
    • The struggle for independence in Bangladesh (formerly East Pakistan) was rooted in long-standing political, economic, and cultural disparities between East and West Pakistan. The Awami League, led by Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, emerged as the primary political force advocating for the rights of Bengalis in East Pakistan. The situation escalated into a full-blown conflict when the Pakistani military launched Operation Searchlight on March 25, 1971, aiming to suppress the independence movement, which led to widespread atrocities and a humanitarian crisis.
  2. Role of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman:
    • Sheikh Mujibur Rahman was a central figure in the independence movement. His leadership and charisma galvanized the Bengali population. However, during the war, he was arrested and taken to West Pakistan, which created a leadership vacuum in the Awami League and the independence movement. His absence during critical moments raised questions about the party’s cohesion and the effectiveness of its leadership.
  3. Internal Conflicts within the Awami League:
    • The document highlights the internal strife within the Awami League during Sheikh Mujib’s absence. Factions within the party began to emerge, leading to conflicts over leadership and strategy. This division was detrimental to the party’s unity and effectiveness in the liberation struggle, suggesting that Sheikh Mujib’s leadership was not able to maintain cohesion among party members.
  4. Formation of the Provisional Government:
    • Following the declaration of independence on March 26, 1971, a provisional government was formed in exile, with Tazuddin Ahmad as the Prime Minister. The document discusses the challenges faced by this government, including securing international recognition and military support. The internal conflicts within the Awami League complicated the government’s ability to present a united front to the international community.
  5. International Relations and Support:
    • The document mentions the role of India and other international actors during the liberation war. India provided significant support to the Bangladeshi independence movement, but there were concerns about the effectiveness of the Awami League’s diplomatic efforts to secure this support. The leadership struggles within the party may have hindered its ability to effectively negotiate and coordinate with India and other nations.
  6. Military Strategy and Challenges:
    • The document critiques the military strategies employed during the liberation war, indicating that there were significant challenges in organizing and executing military operations against the Pakistani forces. The lack of a coherent military strategy and the internal divisions within the Awami League may have contributed to difficulties in achieving military objectives.
  7. Post-War Governance Issues:
    • After the war ended in December 1971, Bangladesh faced immense challenges in rebuilding the nation. The document suggests that the governance issues faced by the new government were partly a result of decisions made during the war. The internal conflicts and lack of a clear political vision may have complicated the process of establishing a stable government and addressing the needs of the population.
  8. Sheikh Mujib’s Return and Leadership:
    • Upon his return to Bangladesh after the war, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman was hailed as the Father of the Nation. However, the document implies that the challenges he faced in unifying the party and governing effectively were significant. The internal divisions and the complexities of post-war governance posed serious obstacles to his leadership.

In summary, the document provides a nuanced view of the events surrounding the Bangladesh Liberation War, highlighting the interplay between leadership, internal party dynamics, international relations, and military strategy.